【Love Nonetheless】

Twitter no longer wants to show you just what's new in its search results,Love Nonetheless it wants to show you who tweeted it best.

The platform has moved further away from reverse chronological order in search to relevance order. Now when you look for something using Twitter's search bar, you'll be shown relevance-ordered tweets from across Twitter first on the results page.

The change occurred in September, according to a Twitter spokesperson, but was announced publicly Monday.

SEE ALSO: Trump didn't invite Twitter's CEO to Trump Tower tech summit

If you still want to see the most recent live tweets, the "latest" filter is still there, as well as "news," "photos" and "videos."

While alterations to the Twitter timeline algorithm caused the internet to briefly lose its mind in early 2016, changes to search are unlikely to cause much of a stir.

However, both tweaks show the social media company's obsession with the difficult concept of "relevance."

Announced in February, Twitter's opt-in timeline changes prioritised what it assessed to be "the best tweets" in a user's timeline, rather than simply showing them the most recent tweets from the people they follow.

Mashable Light Speed Want more out-of-this world tech, space and science stories? Sign up for Mashable's weekly Light Speed newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

Original image has been replaced. Credit: Mashable

In search, the freshest tweets don't necessarily contain the most useful information, but relevancy isn't simple either. Especially when you have to cull from all of Twitter and not just from the accounts users follow.

In a blog post, Lisa Huang, senior software engineer on Twitter's search quality team, explained the difficulty of prioritising so-called relevant tweets in search results.

The team are using machine learning to help decide how tweets will be ordered. "A person's behaviour on Twitter provides an invaluable source of relevance information," she wrote.

"Using this information, we can train machine learning models that predict how likely a Tweet is to be engaged with (Retweets, likes and replies). We can then use these models as scoring functions for ranking by treating the probability of engagement as a surrogate for the relevance of Tweets."

It's not that simple. As she notes, the likelihood of someone engaging with a tweet is also heavily influenced by where it appears. In other words, you're much more likely to retweet something if it's the first thing you see.

The team had to engage with this bias, along with the "noise" of Twitter -- for example, accidentally "liking" a tweet -- when pulling out the most relevant search results for users.

Diversity of results also mattered. Showing tweets from five news outlets who are all sharing the same video is not so helpful -- but which outlet's video should get priority? Huang wrote that the team is still working on adding diversity to search results.

Safe to say, we'll see more of this in the future.

---

Featured Video For You

---

The family of Aboriginal woman, Julieka Dhu, want justice after the 22-year Yamatji woman died in police custody

---

Topics Social Media X/Twitter

• Games
• Life
• Shopping
• Entertainment
• Science
• Social Good
• Deals
• Tech

• Lovesick and Twitter Verified
• Inside the fight to keep 8chan offline
• Apple might bring Touch ID back on iPhones in 2021
• Hailstones the size of baseballs pound parts of Canada
• The Norwegians Who Mistook Their Bus Seats for Muslims
• What Intel's 10th
• Sorry, Trump, everyone on Twitter still cares about your tax returns
• Apple's credit card has some very specific rules
• Alabama’s Tiny Terror
• Stassi from 'Vanderpump Rules' got engaged and we care about it more than we should

• Spotify's 'Playlist in a Bottle' is back. Here's how to get it.
• New Year's resolution deals: A dozen sales to help you kickstart your 2024 goals
• 'Foe' review: Saoirse Ronan and Paul Mescal can't save this empty sci
• The Art of Distance No. 25 by The Paris Review
• What Would Shirley Hazzard Do? by Brigitta Olubas
• Wordle today: The answer and hints for January 5
• Parker Posey, Jason Isaacs, and more check into 'The White Lotus' Season 3
• iPhone 16 Pro: These 2 camera rumors will make you regret the iPhone 15 Pro
• Allen Ginsberg at the End of America by Michael Schumacher
• Apprehending the Light by Scott O’Connor

• Throne of Games
• Uber adds calendar shortcuts to set destinations faster
• People are using voice notes to pre
• What that 'Euphoria' Season 1 finale means for Season 2: Recap
• Mattress Mack Will Save You
• Apple's flashy new credit card is now available (to some)
• Amazon should be excited about the FAA's latest milestone for drones
• Violence in video games? Hasan Minhaj spotlights the real issues
• The Secret Policeman at the Marathon
• What that 'Euphoria' Season 1 finale means for Season 2: Recap

• Yesterday’s Liberal
• Sunny Obama rides last week out with a bang, bites visitor on face
• What that 'Euphoria' Season 1 finale means for Season 2: Recap
• Amazon launches a credit card just for Prime members
• PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds Graphics Performance Revisited: 44 GPUs Tested
• Mexico's solution to Trump's tweets? Buy Twitter and shut it down
• How and why 'Frankenstein's Monster's Monster, Frankenstein' exists
• Twitter meme reveals we're all secretly suckers for these fiction clichés
• It All Comes down to Real Estate
• Bella Hadid unfollows Selena Gomez on Instagram amid The Weeknd dating rumors